where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Monday, May 30, 2022

The Real Cause of and Cure for Crime

Crime is in the news a lot lately, particularly violent crime.  There is just too much of it. 

Of course, nobody knows why any of this is happening, so we have to call in the experts, so they can tell us.

I think life is a lot less complicated than that, and I think the experts are getting it wrong for the most part. 

A recent letter to a newspaper captured this clearly.  The writer says, and I’m sure the experts will agree, that “the unacceptable level of crime in our city is due to many factors: poverty and equity, low employment opportunities in under-resourced neighborhoods, high dropout rates and tension between law enforcement and those communities.”

Apart from the high dropout rates, everything is somebody else’s fault.  Maybe the high dropout rates are somebody else’s fault too.

If only our government had spent billions of more dollars in certain communities, if only we had given poor people more money so they wouldn’t be poor anymore, if only selfish employers, or the government, had made more jobs in certain neighborhoods, if only the police were nicer people, then people wouldn’t resort to crime.  They would be happy and content and wouldn’t want to shoot anybody anymore.

No, people resort to crime and violence, because they have no sense of right and wrong.  Usually that requires a belief in God, Somebody who sees and knows everything and who holds people accountable for their actions.  But even prior to that, it’s a value system that says that certain things are just wrong. 

Many times in my life I have had to figure out what to do about something, and there were always a number of options that were never considered.  Because they were wrong. 

When you have no sense of right and wrong, then wrong things become options, and when things are options, we can find reasons to do them.  Even random, spontaneous violence or crime happens, because a person previously had permitted violence or crime as a viable option for certain situations.

As long as crime and violence are somebody else’s fault, we will never solve them.  We will never feel like society, or somebody else, is doing enough as long as there is high crime.

But nobody can say that I am not responsible for what I did, and society needs to affirm that.  Prosecutors must hold them accountable.  There are no acceptable mitigating circumstances for a crime of violence.

The cure for crime and violence is parenting.  That means a husband and wife in a loving relationship and raising their own children.

 

Of course, there are exceptions.  Of course, there are bad parents.  Of course, there are parents that fail.  But having a child’s natural parents in a loving home is still the best program we have with the highest success rate.

This is not a slight to gay couples.  It’s just that only one member of a gay couple can be a child’s natural parent.  I am talking ideally here.  As much as possible, we should want children to be raised by both of their natural parents.  They are most likely to be the most loving, committed parents to that child. 

What are parents, but fulltime mentors, caregivers, supporters, educators, tutors, individualized support systems for each child?  And most parents find that that child creates a love for them they didn’t expect and didn’t know before.

Whether you believe in God or evolution, they both ended up at the same place.  Children are the result of a mutual biological act that creates new life.  Children prosper best when they have the benefit of both parents together in their lives. 

And all this is at no cost to the public treasury. 

It used to be a shame in our society for an unwed woman to become pregnant and have a child.  Now it is often celebrated.   We don’t want anybody to feel shame for their actions, like they might have made a bad choice.

Our schools encourage children to become sexually active at very young ages.  They don’t teach that sex is something that is meant for marriage yet alone families, or even that marriage is something they might want for their lives.  Sex, yes, marriage, who knows? 

As a society, we should encourage families.  They are the foundation of a society.  The smallest building blocks.  Every new member has two fulltime adult mentors to show them how to live.  There is no better solution. 

The problem, of course, is that encouraging marriage, families, and parenting won’t solve today’s crime problems.  It’s the best answer to solve the future problems but not today’s.

Whatever else you want to do to make society a better place, you need to enforce the rules.  There must be consequences for those who commit crime.  Without that, all those other answers won’t change anything.