where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Monday, November 18, 2019

endless wars


On Veteran’s Day, we stop to think of those who have died serving their country in the military.  We ask the question: was it worth it?  Was the conflict worth the lives of those who gave it? 

Wars have changed in my lifetime.  Now we must fight kinder, gentler wars so that we don’t run the risk of being accused of war crimes.  If we had fought WW1 or WW2 under the new rules, we would have lost.  If both sides fought by the new rules, we would have had another endless war. 

War is hell.  I get that.  I missed my chance at war.  It would have been Viet Nam, but then that was one of those wars where we weren’t really trying to win it.  We wanted somebody else to win it, and we would help them.  And that is one of the reasons we get endless wars.   A short war requires going all out.  You have to defeat the enemy decisively, so that they surrender unconditionally.  Otherwise, you’re going to end up fighting the war all over again in a few years. 

This is what is happening in the Middle East.  Israel and its neighbors have been at war for 70 years.  Two of them experienced a major defeat, and they  signed peace treaties with Israel.  The others in most cases simply endured imposed cease fires, and the war just keeps going on and on.  They won’t end until one side defeats the other, so that they surrender.  Then the war ends.

Germany and Japan suffered tremendous losses in World War 2.  Frankly, that was the only way that war would have ended.  And it did.  And now we are friends and allies with both nations.  As horrible as war is, it almost seems necessary at times to resolve the issues. 

Now a new thing has emerged, yet it is actually an old thing.  Islam has been at war with itself and the non-Muslim world for 1500 years.  That’s not going to end soon or ever.  And this is a different kind of war.  The soldiers don’t wear uniforms and in many  cases do not have defined borders to their realms.   And they probably won’t surrender as easily as Germany and Japan did. 

If you don’t want an endless war if you were involved with one of these, you will need to use incredible power but you will need to warn everybody else to get as far away from the enemy as possible, because their safety cannot be guaranteed.

This is the simplest reason why wars take so long today.  We are trying so hard to protect people who not directly our enemy that we are not able to hurt our enemy hard enough that they would want to quit.  You quit; they win.  You keep fighting, and you have an endless war.

Saturday, November 2, 2019

some advice for the Democratic Party and those candidates who are thinking about dropping out


The Democratic Party is in the process of choosing its next Presidential candidate.  Now we are hearing that one candidate has dropped out and another is close to dropping out, and nobody has even cast a vote yet.

But you may say, they are low in the polls and don’t have enough money to continue.  Nonsense.
The problem is that our current political system is not suitable for too many candidates at one time.  In a poll and even in the primaries, you must choose only one candidate.  Do you choose your favorite or the one you think will have the best chance of winning? 

Right now you have about 20 candidates running, and only one will win the nomination.  So you have people voting for 19 people who will not win.  You need to know who they would vote for if their candidate was out of the race.  That’s the only way you will know who the best candidate is. 

In the primaries, every voter should be able to vote for, say, up to 5 people.  You could rank them, but it probably isn’t necessary here.  That would give you a much better idea who the best candidate would be, who the majority of the voters really want.

Beto and Harris should not give up now.  As long as they can stay in the debates, they will have a chance.  But they should be fighting now to change the way votes are cast in the primaries.  The current way is not only not fair, but it won’t give them the best candidate.