where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Monday, September 27, 2021

The Single Biggest Problem Facing America Today Part 3

We have been saying in these articles that if we don’t know what America is, what kind of country we were founded to be, we will gradually change into something else.  Most of us won’t even know it, but America will be gone, just as if we had been taken over by a foreign country. 

If I had to describe what America is in one sentence, it would be this: God has given unalienable rights to human beings. 

But what does this all mean? 

The first thing this means is that we are not a secular country.  I think different people would define what a secular country is differently, but the current version that our country has bought into is that it is unconstitutional for our country to favor one religion over another, or even to favor theism over atheism.  Our government must be neutral to all religions, meaning that each one has the same value as another, or essentially no value at all in how our country is run.  If you can’t invoke one, then you can’t invoke another.

Supposedly this is based on the First Amendment, which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

What people are forgetting is that at that time in Europe, they had and still have today state churches.  The Queen of England is head of the Church of England.  A king or queen could personally not have any belief in God at all, and yet they would still be head of a Church by virtue of their position.  Our Founders did not want the government running the Church or the Church running the government. 

What people are forgetting is that a religion is a worldview.  Everybody has a worldview; nations have worldviews.  For all of world history, nations all had a religious worldview.  If not explicitly, then implicitly.  Now in the last century, with the rise of communism, we have countries whose worldview explicitly does not include a god.  There are people in our country who say that we were founded as a secular nation, and thus we are and should be one today.

The problem with that is that our nation was built on the belief that God did something that affects every human being.  Without that, we don’t have our country.

This secularism in our country today stems from several decisions of that court called supreme that removed prayer and Bible reading from our nation’s public schools. 

Except that prayer and Bible reading in public schools have been the practice even before our nation officially became a nation.  If this was indeed unconstitutional, then the Founders would have seen that this ended in their generation.  It would not have taken almost 200 years for the practice to be deemed forbidden by our Constitution.  They knew what they meant by the First Amendment better than we do and whether it had prohibited prayer and Bible reading in the public schools.  Why would the First Congress establish the office of chaplain in Congress and open their daily business with prayer if prayer was forbidden in the government and the public square?  

But the bigger question is: how can we teach our children and the millions of immigrants who come here every year the principles of our nation without mentioning God?

If we don’t recognize the role of God in the founding of our nation, then the very idea of unalienable rights will change.

Unalienable rights are rights that precede and supersede government.  Government did not give them, and government cannot take them away.

But if we don’t recognize these rights as having come from God, then they must have come from the government or the consensus of the people.  The government is now the highest authority.

Our Founders debated whether to include an enumerating of these unalienable rights in the Constitution, because they were afraid that people would come to think that these rights came from man and not God, hence they would be subject to change or restrictions.  They finally settled on including some of these rights as the first Ten Amendments to our Constitution.

But it needs to be asked what God we are talking about.  How would the Founders know that God gave these unalienable rights to human beings? 

The Declaration of Independence says that the Founders deemed these rights to be self-evident.  Some have concluded by this that the Founders were deists, that these rights were merely natural law.  The problem with that is that a deist god wouldn’t give rights to human beings, let alone inform them that it had. 

And I can’t imagine a nation would go to war with the world’s superpower over the musings of its philosophers. 

Generally, we speak of God as a belief.  The Founders spoke of God as a fact.  And without God, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’t have the United States of America