where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Thursday, September 16, 2021

The Single Biggest Problem Facing America Today Part 2

We said in part 1 that the single biggest problem facing America today is knowing what America is, what the defining principles are that make it what it is.  If we don’t know what they are, we will soon become a different country.  And we won’t even know it.  But that America which we used to call the greatest country in the history of the world will be no more.

We said that the United States is founded on 5 ideas, actually propositions, as given in the Declaration of Independence.

The first proposition is that all men are created equal.

Some people today, educated people even, assert that the Declaration is sexist, because it says that all MEN are created equal.  What about women?

Throughout the history of the English language, the word ‘man’ has always had two meanings: man as distinct from woman, and man as distinct from animals.  Everybody spoke of mankind, and nobody thought it only spoke of men.  But recently, people started complaining that this use of the word is sexist, because they felt women were intentionally excluded, or unintentionally because they were so demeaned in men’s eyes.  I don’t think anybody who thinks this will accept any explanation I can offer to the contrary, so I won’t even make any more.

The Declaration talks about being CREATED equal.  That means, in the sight of the law and God, we are all on an even plane.  There is nothing inherently different between us such that one has more intrinsic worth or position than another.  One man cannot rule over another without their consent. 

We forget that at the time the Declaration was written, nations were ruled by kings.  Kings weren’t elected.  This rule was passed down through families, except for the occasional military coup.  But it was accepted that some people had a divine or inherent right to rule over other people.

But, no, the Founders said, we are all created equal.

We will no longer have rulers but representatives.

But, people will say, didn’t we have slavery?  Isn’t that one people ruling over another? 

Indeed it is.

Prior to the American Revolution, slavery was legal in all the colonies.  But that wasn’t the decision of the American people.  They were colonies, under British rule.  When the colonies became independent states, some states soon became free, and some remained slave states.  It took a Civil War and several Constitutional amendments to finally get rid of it.

But the Declaration of Independence declared the ideal which the nation as a whole finally lived up to.   But if the Declaration of Independence didn’t define our nation in this way, we might never have ended it.  It was colonists living under kingly rule who rebelled against that rule who clearly described the true condition of men.  I mean, humans.

But we haven’t been teaching this to our children and all our new immigrants, because this equality is from God, and some people have been led to believe that it is unconstitutional to talk about God in the public square, our public schools, and the government in general.

But without a grounding in our founding principles, the understanding of them changes.

We can’t say that people are created equal, so what’s left is equal, the idea that everybody is equal, and if things don’t look equal, it is the responsibility of the government to make them equal.

So if any particular group of people, and race is now the most commonly used definer, has, say, less than the average rate of homeownership, then that group is deemed not equal, and it is now the role of government to find a way to increase homeownership in that demographic group to equal that of others (meaning: whites).

The idea of equality morphed again, so that now the common word is equity.  The difference is that equity focuses on the need for government to take stronger action to make sure that ‘less equal’ groups become more equal to, well, white people.

Equity requires the government to help people it considers disadvantaged in some way, so that they do better in life, however the government determines its criteria. 

This is achieved in either of two ways:

One, the government funnels money either directly or indirectly to these selected people or groups.  The other is to compel its citizens to favor these people or groups in certain ways over other people or groups.

The question for us now is whether this view of equality and equity is compatible with what America is.  Is this consistent with the founding principle of all men, I mean people, are created equal.

And the answer is no.

How can I be so sure?

Economics.

Our country has been in existence for almost 250 years.  It was the early 60s when the court called supreme ruled that we cannot favor one religion over another, including apparently even just believing in God as well.  It was the mid-60s when government began assuming the responsibility to take care of everybody.  Before then, it was called charity, and it was all voluntary.

Since then, government spending has grown exponentially, and we have learned that there isn’t enough money in the world to do everything we now want government to do. 

For all of our nation’s history prior to that time, our government was able to live within its means, and government debt was considered irresponsible and immoral. 

But now, the list of peoples who need to be made more equal and all the ways that equality needs to be achieved have driven our nation into such debt that it has long given up the idea of paying that debt off.  And that is un-American.

So, no, it is not the role of government to meet every need, solve every problem, look over and check up on all its people (non-citizens as well as citizens) to see that they are all living the American dream.   

Part 3 – what are rights?