where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Sunday, July 15, 2018

The Single Most Important Thing We Can Do to Make our Economy Prosper

There is a man running for Congress in my district who I offered to help.  This is the fourth article I have written for him. 


Before I talk about the best thing to do for our economy, let me first talk about one of the worst things we do..  The only reason I mention one of the worst things is that it is something that Democrats strongly believe in, and that is government spending.

Imagine you are with your neighbors at a gathering.  There are 10 of you, and you all make around $50,000 a year.  You decide to form a small government for your block, and so you hire someone from the next block to oversee things on your block.  You pay him the same as what you make, and your pay immediately shrinks to $45,000 a year.  That’s $5,000 in taxes per person to pay for your new government. 

Add up all the taxes you pay, federal, state, property, sales, Social Security, Medicare, utility, excise, and you might well end up paying half your income in taxes.  Democrats are on a mission to increase government spending.  They don’t feel they are doing their job if they don’t constantly find more things to spend money on.  Then every few years they will try to raise taxes, because the debt is so high.  We already pay about a half trillion dollars a year in interest alone on our federal debt.  That’s money that just wasted.  Like burning it.

Democrats also like to have a lot of people receiving government assistance.  They feel like they are helping people.  If it was for a little while to help somebody get through a rough time, that would be one thing.  But they really don’t care if a person ever gets off government assistance.  They would probably be happiest if every person got a check from the government for something, unless, of course, you are very rich, in which case they feel they have the right to tell you how much or how little of your money you get to keep for yourself.

I believe the single most important thing we can do to give us the best possible economy is to bring the jobs back to America.

We used to make all of our stuff here.  Good paying full time jobs with medical insurance were standard in our country.  Middle class families were raising large families on one income, and as the population increased, so would the demand, and so would the jobs. 

Then in the 1990s, free trade became all the rage, and companies left our country like mice running out of sight when you turn on the lights.  You can always make something cheaper somewhere else in the world, so free trade sent millions of our jobs to other countries.  It’s hard to find anything made in America anymore, and most jobs here now don’t pay enough to support a family by themselves.

Our government leaders, I’m told, are trying to get other countries to buy more of our goods, so that our export industry can provide jobs for our workers.  I think that’s good, but not good policy.    Trying to build an economy on exports means that we are hoping that all the other countries prosper first so they can buy our products so that we can prosper.  We are tying the success of our economy on others having success first.  That’s just dumb.

We used to tax all imports to our country.  Taxes on imports used to pay for almost our entire federal budget.  We didn’t even have an income tax until 1913, and that was only meant for the very rich, and it was only a small amount.

Now when everything is made outside of our country and the wages for the jobs left in our country are dismal, yes, taxing imports raises the cost of a lot of products, and people are encouraged to complain about this.

But we have to bring the jobs back here.  More people will be working at better paying jobs with better benefits, like employer based medical insurance. 

But, but but . . .  then other countries will tax our imports to their countries, as if they aren’t doing that already. 

When Toyota first came into the American market, they were taxed, and they cost more than similar American cars.  And they wore that like a badge of honor.  They wouldn’t negotiate prices, and Americans flocked to buy them, because they saw themselves as getting something special. 

Foreign products were always available in our country, and they were always more expensive, and nobody cared, because they were, well, foreign products.  But they were true foreign products, like French wine, and Swiss chocolate.  They weren’t American goods made somewhere else and then shipped back here. 

Democrats always talk about how they are for the American workers, but they never talk about bringing the jobs back.  They are content to have half the country on government assistance programs, so they are seen as the compassionate ones.  They would rather people be dependent on the government than independent, self-reliant, and prosperous. 

When people don’t have jobs, not only does the government lose their tax revenues, but it also ends up paying people for not working.  We lose twice.  And so, when people have good jobs, they pay taxes on their incomes, and everybody else doesn’t have to support them.

I should add too that after the jobs left our country, the government got short on money, so they increased taxes on the companies that were still here, and that caused a lot of other companies to leave the country.  Republicans lowered corporate taxes last year that removed some of the incentive for companies to leave our country, but the country is divided over the issue of taxing imports.

As the country is divided, it makes it harder for businesses to know what to do, because they don’t want to invest a lot of money moving their operations and then find everything going back the way it was in a few years. 

But the jobs left as we stopped taxing imports, and I don’t see another way to bring them back without taxing them again.  We should tax them all and probably at the same rate.  Exceptions could be made in special cases.  Not sure yet what those would be.

Yes, there will be some pain and adjustment for a while, because some prices will go up before the jobs come back, but when you have half a dozen appliance manufacturers making the same thing, prices will go down again with the competition. 

Many of our politicians have given up the idea of bringing the jobs back.  They say it can’t be done.  I don’t believe that.  And why in the world would we not even try?  When people are working at good paying jobs, they feel good about themselves, and the government won’t have to borrow billions of dollars from other countries just to pay its bills.