where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Monday, March 5, 2018

Is taxing imports bad for our country? a letter sent to the Chicago Tribune


The Tribune ran an editorial (March 4) titled Trump’s Terrible Tariffs. 

I believe the issue of taxing imports is one of the most important issues for our country today, and I believe that all products entering the United States should be taxed, preferably at the same rate but exceptions may be made in unusual circumstances. 

There are at least 4 reasons why I believe taxing imports is important.
1)         The bigger issue is bringing jobs back to our country and not whether you can save some money on something you buy.   When Toyota first hit the American market, their prices were higher than that for American cars and without negotiated prices, but Americans were happy to pay the higher prices, because they believed they were getting a better product.

The fact is, though, that anything can be made cheaper somewhere in the world.  And probably more often than not, it is an American company choosing to make its products somewhere else and then shipping them back here.

The product is cheaper, but we lose jobs here.  We lose the taxes paid by those employees, and we then pay the unemployed workers while they are not working.  All this puts more pressure on all the governments, local and federal, to raise taxes or just borrow the money and hope the public doesn’t pay attention to how much money is then paid for interest on that debt. 

Keeping the jobs in America is more important than saving a few dollars on a refrigerator.  Your taxes will be lower, government debt will be lower, and inflation will be lower.

We didn’t even have an income tax until 1913.  Taxes on imports paid for almost our entire federal budget.
2)         Consumer prices may rise a bit at first, but they will go down as more companies start making products here.  Taxing imports is often called protectionism, a label that is supposed to immediately warn us that the practice is bad.  In this case, it is bad,  we are told, because American manufacturers will feel free to gouge the American consumer with their prices.  The editorial specifically named foreign competition as a great incentive for American producers to become more efficient and thus more productive leading to cheaper retail prices.

So whatever happened to domestic competition?  The editorial sounded like American producers collude to keep their prices high and that it is only the threat of a cheaper foreign product that pushes them to try harder and consequently make a cheaper product. 

Not so.  When you have a dozen American refrigerator manufacturers competing for your business, you will get the best prices they can offer. 

When I was growing up, you could always buy foreign products. And they almost always cost more.  But they were genuine foreign products, like Swiss chocolate and French wine, and not American products made somewhere else and then sent back here.

3)         Taxing imports allows us to decide if we want to pay more taxes.  A tax on imports is money that goes directly to our government.  It raises the cost of the consumer item, but you don’t have to pay the tax if you buy American.  So people who buy American will pay less taxes than those who don’t.

Right now the system is skewed a bit, because we have allowed foreign made products to take over our economy.  It’s hard to find anything made in America anymore.  And if you do, it costs more than a comparable foreign made product.  We have more government safety and other regulations than other countries, and we pay our employees more and with more employee benefits. 

Bring the jobs back.  As more people start working, government costs will go down, and taxes will go down.  You can’t judge our economy by the unemployment rate when we don’t count the people who have stopped looking for work, and that’s almost 40%..

4)         Trying to rely on exports for our prosperity is not a wise plan.  Exporting products should always be considered a bonus and not the crux of an economy.  Exports rely on the prosperity of another country for them to be able to buy our goods, and so, in other words, we are hoping for other countries to prosper first in order for us to prosper.  They go into recession, then we go into recession.

Why would anyone want to do that? 

When imports are really American products being made somewhere else and then shipped back here, the company essentially forces all the other American companies making the same product to go overseas as well.  And the cost to the American economy is immeasurable.   

When a foreign product is heavily subsidized by its government to make it cheaper, then we send all our money overseas, and why would we want to do that either? 

Bottom line: everything coming into our country should be taxed and preferably, I would say, at the same rate.  We are not punishing other nations.  We are taking care of our own people first, just like we would expect any other country to do.