where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Sunday, March 27, 2022

Critical Race Theory: Good, Bad, or Indifferent?

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a description of life in America which, while it has a basis in fact, focuses on the wrong things and so draws the wrong conclusions. 

Is America racist?

Depends on what you mean.

Are there racists in America?

Of course, there are.  And there are racists in every country of the world.  This is the human condition. 

In 1994, there was a war in Rwanda between the Hutus and the Tutsis.  Both groups were blacks, one was a minority group that had more political power than the other.  But when the killing began, it was simply based on which group you belonged to.  People had identification cards in their wallets to tell them apart.

Is there systemic racism in America? 

Again, it depends on what you mean and what that means.

There is not a country in the world today where a black person has more freedom and opportunity to achieve success in life than in America, however you want to define it. 

Is it harder for a black person to achieve this success than for a white person? 

In many or most cases, I would say yes. 

And this is where I believe CRT goes astray.  Not all the problems blacks face are caused by other people.  I submit that three of the largest problems in the black community are single parent homes, high dropout rates from school, and crime.  Are these self-inflicted problems or caused by other people?  CRT would want to fault other people as the primary cause of all the ills of black people.

Imagine a marathon run.

Imagine that white people get to start 5 miles into the race. 

Wait, that is unfair. 

If the goal is to be the first person across the finish line, yes, that is unfair and wrong.

But the goal of a marathon for most people is to just finish the race.  That is success, and whether you finish the race, that is entirely up to you.

CRT says the whole thing is broken.  The system, the people, the whole dang country.

I submit we live in the best country in the world to do whatever it is you want to do.  If you focus on that, what they call racism is but a headwind in the run.  When people are focusing on what they consider obstacles, they are not running toward the goal but standing on the sidelines complaining, while everyone else is running.

But shouldn’t we try to improve our country?  Root out racism?

Sure.  And how do you propose we do that?

The Founders believed it was through the Bible and Christianity.  Racism wasn’t their focus but a society where people cared for each other and weren’t reliant on other people.  Other people, though, were there to help them if they needed it.

It was Christianity and the Bible that taught our people to love their neighbors as themselves and to do unto others as you would have others do unto you.

We’ve lost this in our country.  Primarily because the court called supreme said we can’t talk or teach about God in our public schools, and so we essentially removed God from public life 

CRT wants to remake our country by changing the system, where the real need is to change people.  If you change the system, we will lose the freedoms that made our country great.  It will try to legislate equality, and while it may raise up some people on the very bottom, it will bring everybody else down in the process.  We will all be more equal, but more equally poor.