where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Monday, July 13, 2020

Why is America so divided, what it means, and what can we do about it?


Our country has never been more divided than it is today, and it is near the breaking point. 

The reason it is so divided is that we now have 3 competing narratives about the nature of our country, and there is no common ground with any of them.  That means there is nowhere to compromise or reach agreement.

The first narrative has to do with the foundation of our nation.

The Founders believed and the founding principle of our nation is that God gave unalienable rights to human beings, rights that precede and supersede government.  But those rights can only come from God, because in a secular country, there is no higher authority than the government.

The court called supreme said that our nation cannot aid or favor one religion over another, so we end up with no religion at all in our public square, we cannot mention God, so we cannot even talk about unalienable rights in our public schools.  Generations have grown up not even knowing that we have unalienable rights.

But our nation is a nation of rights, so without acknowledging God, the only rights left are those given to us by the government or the consensus of the people.  While unalienable rights are things that you can do without the government’s permission, regulation, or interference, government-given rights are things that the government owes you, things that you are entitled to.

Since our nation changed its understanding on human rights, government spending has exploded, such that there isn’t enough money in the whole country to meet all the demands for it.

The second narrative is about the character of our nation.  Actually there are two narratives here.  One, the first, is that our nation is the greatest nation in the history of the world, a nation built on freedom, that has lifted more people out of poverty and oppression than any other nation in history.

The other narrative is that our nation is inherently and irreparably flawed and must be dismantled and redone from the ground up. 

The simplest way to tell which narrative here is correct is by looking at our immigration numbers. 

No nation in the world has more people who want to move here.  Far more.  Not only that, but those who find our country so reprehensible have no plans on leaving it to find a better one.  They can’t name one country that is better.  A few countries score higher in public happiness or things like that, but there is no mad rush to go to any of them.

So half our country wants to make it better.  The other half wants to take it apart and start over.
The third narrative is about the morals of our nation, that our country is inherently racist and oppressive.  Most recently, our nation has been torn apart by weeks of violent riots and protests over these same things.

There are three problems though with all this commotion.

First, I have been following all the news closely, and I see no concrete proposals to deal with or to solve this racism and oppression.  There is a proposal to defund the police, which is interpreted to mean either a total disbanding of them or just a reallocation of much of their funding to social services. 

But that has nothing to do with the ‘inherent’ racism and oppression.

The second problem is that this isn’t really about racism and oppression. 

Why do I say this?  The killing of George Floyd brought worldwide protests and violence.  Yet every week, black communities in our big cities are battered by gun violence, killing the smallest of our children, and the protests are small, short-lasting, and peaceful.

Why the difference?

Because the major protests are organized by political groups with bigger agendas.  They want to create as much dissatisfaction, disgust, and disillusionment as possible with everything about our current system, so they can use a crisis to make basic, major changes to that system. 

If these groups were really interested in black lives, they would have been protesting the killings of our children years ago.

And the third problem with all this commotion is that it is not meant to solve anything. 

Why do I say that?

This overlaps a little with the last point.  The people who have organized these protests don’t want to fix the system but abolish it and make a new one. 

But it’s also about blaming ‘other’ people for all the problems.  They cannot tell you what they want other people to do to fix these problems.  Some say they want reparations.  Money.  So, say, we give everybody who wants it $50,000. 

After they buy that car, that flat screen tv, or maybe put a down payment on a house, what will have changed?  Will the system be fairer?  Will everybody be happy now?  Will everybody like everybody now? 

Nothing will have changed.  The money will be spent, and everybody and everything will be back where we started.

People forget that our entire current welfare system started shortly after the passing of our civil rights laws and was primarily meant to help those same people who had marched for those rights.

When the problem for everything is that other people aren’t doing enough for you, then there is nothing you can do for yourself that will make a difference.  And then people lose hope, and you’ve lost everything.

Nobody is giving any specific things that we can change. 

And actually a lot of people like it that way.  Because they want to take down the whole system.  Without giving specific proposals, they want to focus on the system itself.  That the whole thing is wrong.  Take the whole thing down and start over. 

Those people who remember history know where this is leading.  This was done before in Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, and a few other places. 

Those who remember history remember that those were countries where people have been trying for decades to leave.  They built walls to keep their people from escaping.

So what can we do to get through all this?

For decades now, our political leaders have pushed for diversity.  They said that that was our strength.  And they were wrong.  It weakened us with everybody pulling in different directions.
Instead of focusing on what divides us, we need to have something that unites us.

We would need political leaders to show the way.  Actually it doesn’t have to be a political leader, but somebody who can get the nation’s attention.  And right now, our nation is being run by whoever can make the most noise.

Our founding principle of unalienable rights given to us by God is what made our country the freest and most prosperous in the world.  I believe that should be our starting point.  That is why our Founders went to war to create this new nation in the first place.  Yes, they had particular grievances with England, but those were merely examples of how England was trampling on their unalienable rights.

The idea of our nation being reprehensible should be rejected by the mere fact that millions more people want to come here than actually can.  Maybe in some people’s minds the nation is inherently evil.  When more people want to leave here than come here, then maybe we can talk about that.

Is America racist?  Does that mean that not everybody will like you for things you can’t change?  By that definition, perhaps so.  But if you think that you cannot achieve better things for your life by living wisely, no amount of government programs or government money is going to make any difference.