where religion and politics meet

Everybody has a worldview. A worldview is what you believe about life: what is true, what is false, what is right, what is wrong, what are the rules, are there any rules, what is the meaning of life, what is important, what is not.

If a worldview includes a god/God, it is called a religion. If a bunch of people have the same religion, they give it a name.

Nations have worldviews too, a prevailing way of looking at life that directs government policies and laws and that contributes significantly to the culture. Politics is the outworking of that worldview in public life.

We are being told today that the United States is and has always been a secular nation, which is practical atheism.

But our country could not have been founded as a secular nation, because a secular country could not guarantee freedom of religion. Secular values would be higher than religious ones, and they would supersede them when there was a conflict. Secularism sees religion only as your personal preferences, like your taste in food, music, or movies. It does not see religion, any religion, as being true.

But even more basic, our country was founded on the belief that God gave unalienable rights to human beings. But what God, and how did the Founders know that He had? Islam, for example, does not believe in unalienable rights. It was the God of the Bible that gave unalienable rights, and it was the Bible that informed the Founders of that. The courts would call that a religious opinion; the Founders would call that a fact.

Without Christianity, you don’t have unalienable rights, and without unalienable rights, you don’ have the United States of America.

A secular nation cannot give or even recognize unalienable rights, because there is no higher power in a secular nation than the government.

Unalienable rights are the basis for the American concept of freedom and liberty. Freedom and liberty require a high moral code that restrains bad behavior among its people; otherwise the government will need to make countless laws and spend increasingly larger amounts of money on law enforcement.

God, prayer, the Bible, and the Ten Commandments were always important parts of our public life, including our public schools, until 1963, when the court called supreme ruled them unconstitutional, almost 200 years after our nation’s founding.

As a secular nation, the government now becomes responsible to take care of its people. It no longer talks about unalienable rights, because then they would have to talk about God, so it creates its own rights. Government-given rights are things that the government is required to provide for its people, which creates an enormous expense which is why our federal government is now $22 trillion in debt.

Our country also did not envision a multitude of different religions co-existing in one place, because the people, and the government, would then be divided on the basic questions of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Our Constitution, which we fought a war to be able to enact, states, among other things, that our government exists for us to form a more perfect union, ensure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It could not do this unless it had a clear vision of what it considers to be true, a vision shared with the vast majority of the people in this country.

I want to engage the government, the culture, and the people who live here to see life again from a Christian perspective and to show how secularism is both inadequate and just plain wrong.

Because religion deals with things like God, much of its contents is not subject to the scientific method, though the reasons why one chooses to believe in God or a particular religion certainly demand serious investigation, critical thinking, and a hunger for what is true.

Science and education used to be valuable tools in the search for truth, but science has chosen to answer the foundational questions of life without accepting the possibility of any supernatural causes, and education generally no longer considers the search to be necessary, possible, or worthwhile.

poligion: 1) the proper synthesis of religion and politics 2) the realization, belief, or position that politics and religion cannot be separated or compartmentalized, that a person’s religion invariably affects one’s political decisions and that political decisions invariably stem from one’s worldview, which is what a religion is.

If you are new to this site, I would encourage you to browse through the older articles. They deal with a lot of the more basic issues. Many of the newer articles are shorter responses to particular problems.

Visit my other websites theimportanceofhealing blogspot.com where I talk about healing and my book of the same name and LarrysBibleStudies.blogspot.com where I am posting all my other Bible studies. Follow this link to my videos on youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb-RztuRKdCEQzgbhp52dCw

If you want to contact me, email is best: lacraig1@sbcglobal.net

Thank you.

Larry Craig

Thursday, April 16, 2020

Returning to Normal


We are in the middle of a crisis unlike any we have ever known. 

I am not talking about the virus.  I am talking about the forced shutdown of our society, the forcing of millions of businesses to close and the forcing of tens of millions of people out of work.

All this raises questions of what can be done to prevent this from happening again, how this will change society and culture as we know it, and what things should be changed in light of problems in our current society and culture that have now been made prominent.

I have been told numerous times to keep my writings short, so I will have to come back to this subject a number of times.

I have never been a fan of globalism.  We sent millions of jobs to China to save a few dollars on our small appliances, and we spent hundreds of millions of dollars combatting the emerald ash borer, the Asian long-horned beetle, and I think there was another one, all of which came over with the imports.  We lost 22 million ash trees in Michigan alone, and that number is probably ten years old.

We have medical companies in China that couldn’t export needed medical supplies to the United States, because China wanted them first. 

I think it is unwise for a country to be dependent on another country for anything.  Some countries have to, but we don’t. 

Companies move their production overseas, because it is cheaper.  Most of these countries do not have an Environmental Protection Agency, minimum wage laws, labor unions, company-based medical insurance, OSHA, child labor laws, labor protection laws, OT rules, and all sorts of other inconveniences companies here have to deal with. 

You can always make something cheaper somewhere else in the world. 

This is why our country for most of our history taxed imports.  We didn’t even have an income tax until 1913.  Taxes on imports paid for almost our entire federal budget.

Recently, when the government imposed some taxes on imports, the newspapers howled that this tax was hurting the American consumers.  Well, for that matter, all taxes hurt the American consumer.   At least, this was a voluntary tax.  You didn’t have to buy that foreign-made product. 

Except, of course, that we didn’t make most of those things here anymore.  When we tax imports, we should end up making these products here again.  Won’t the prices be higher?  When you have 5 American companies making that same small appliance, prices go down. 

When companies leave our country, people here lose jobs and leave the workforce in many cases.  And that costs our society enormous amounts of money in other ways.  So we think we’re saving money on that cheap appliance from China, but we pay for it a dozen times over in many subtle, unnoticed, secondary ways.

When we make our stuff in other countries, then that other country is able to have control over us to some extent.  If we don’t do something they want, they can just withhold our products, or worse.

Foreign products have always been available in our country.  They were always more expensive, and nobody cared.  But they were true foreign products, like Swiss chocolate and French wine.  They weren’t American products made somewhere else and then shipped back here.

If this experience brings a lot of our jobs back home, then some good came out of it.  We won World War 2 due in a large part to our extraordinary manufacturing capability.  We gave most of that up through globalism.  We should make all of our own stuff here period.